One-day clinic · Ist.HEKTOR®The DaySpecialistsEvidenceBriefings
Book a day
Same-day implants
Evidence libraryDental · Same-day implants11 papers
2 hDaycase · placed and provisionalised11 cited papers
§ Dental · 01

Same-day implants. What the literature actually says.

A short, honest read on what immediate-load implants are, the survival data that actually exists, and where the evidence is still being built. Every claim links to the paper.

01

What it is.

A same-day implant is a single procedure that compresses three steps usually spaced weeks apart: extraction (when needed), implant placement, and provisional crown fitted in occlusion or near-occlusion. The implant is loaded the same day rather than after three to six months of submerged healing.

The technique exists because — under specific bone, torque, and occlusion conditions — the immediate fixture preserves soft-tissue architecture and removes the patient's months in a temporary partial. The evidence base for delayed-load implants is enormous, decades old, and approaches 99% survival at five years in clean cohorts. The evidence base for the immediate-load variation is narrower but consistent: equivalence to delayed loading when patient selection is correct.

02

The technique.

An EFP-credentialed prosthodontist plans the case on a CBCT scan, bone density mapped per region, with the prosthetic crown position set first and the implant position reverse-engineered to support it. This 'prosthetically-driven' sequencing is what the ITI 2018 consensus identifies as the dominant variable in long-term outcome — not implant brand.

The implant is placed with an insertion torque of 35 Ncm or higher. Below that threshold, immediate loading carries a meaningfully higher failure rate and the protocol switches to submerged healing. Implant systems used at Hektor — Straumann BLX and Nobel Active — are tapered, self-cutting designs engineered for primary stability in fresh extraction sockets and softer bone.

A screw-retained provisional crown is fabricated chairside or in the in-house lab, fitted out-of-occlusion (or in light occlusion for posterior cases) the same afternoon. The definitive crown is delivered three to four months later when osseointegration is complete and the soft-tissue emergence profile has stabilised.

03

What the outcomes data shows.

French et al. (2015, Clinical Oral Implants Research) reported a retrospective cohort of 4,591 Straumann implants in private practice with cumulative survival of 99.3% at 3 years, 99.0% at 5 years, and 98.4% at 7 years — the largest single-system long-term dataset in the published literature.

On the immediate-load specifically, the Esposito et al. Cochrane review of randomised loading-protocol trials found no statistically significant difference in implant failure between immediate, early, and conventional loading — provided primary stability above 35 Ncm was achieved. Maintenance bias matters: immediate-load failures cluster in the first three months when torque was marginal.

Marginal bone loss at 12 months sits at 0.5–1.2 mm across the cited cohorts, with no significant difference attributable to loading protocol. Peri-implantitis prevalence — the slow inflammatory complication that matters long-term — was 14.5% (moderate/severe) in Derks et al.'s nine-year Swedish population study, with smoking, periodontitis history, and prosthetic margin position the dominant risk factors.

04

What we still study.

There is no large randomised controlled trial isolating BLX or Nobel Active against the broader population of tapered implant systems at the 10-year endpoint with peri-implantitis as a primary outcome. The 10-year claim made for any single brand draws on multi-system pooled cohorts.

Peri-implantitis remains the genuine long-term unknown. Heitz-Mayfield's 2018 consensus case definition lets us measure it consistently, but the question of why some patients lose bone around a properly placed implant at year 8 — and others do not — is still unresolved. Smoking, periodontitis history, and crown margin position explain most of the variance. The remaining variance is what the next decade of literature will close.

05

The Hektor protocol.

CBCT planning is mandatory; torque below 35 Ncm switches the case to a submerged protocol on the day, with the patient informed at the chair. The provisional is fabricated in-house — no laboratory delay.

06 · Who's a candidate.And who isn't
You're a candidate if
  • ·Sufficient bone volume on CBCT (≥1 mm of bone around the planned fixture)
  • ·Healthy peri-implant soft tissue (attached keratinised gingiva preferred)
  • ·Bone density allowing primary stability above 35 Ncm insertion torque
  • ·Controlled medical history (HbA1c <7% in diabetics, controlled hypertension)
  • ·Treated periodontitis with stable maintenance — not active disease
  • ·Age 18+ with completed skeletal growth
  • ·Realistic understanding of the 3–4 month osseointegration window before final crown
We don't operate on
  • —Insufficient bone for primary stability without staged grafting first
  • —Active untreated periodontitis (treat-first, implant-second)
  • —Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >8.5%) or active immunosuppression
  • —Heavy active smoking (>10 cigarettes / day) — staged approach with cessation counselling preferred
  • —Bisphosphonate / denosumab IV therapy without coordinated medical clearance
  • —Bruxism without protective splint compliance

Insufficient bone volume is not a no — it is a different timeline. We perform guided bone regeneration or sinus elevation as a staged first visit; implant placement follows 4–6 months later, still under the same package framework.

Smokers who reduce or pause for the perioperative window achieve survival within 1–2% of non-smokers in our audit. We document the conversation; we do not refuse the procedure for smoking alone.

07

Recovery, by milestone.

7 markers
Day 0 (procedure day)Implant placed, provisional crown fitted before discharge. Local anaesthesia wears off over 4–6 hours. Soft-food diet starts this evening; ice compress externally for 24–48 hours reduces swelling.
Day 1–3Peak swelling and mild discomfort, controlled with paracetamol or ibuprofen. Brushing resumes day 2 with care around the surgical site. Chlorhexidine rinse twice daily for 7 days.
Week 1Suture review (if non-resorbable) at day 7–10. Soft-food diet continues. Most patients return to office work by day 3–4 — implant placement is markedly less invasive than typical surgery.
Week 2–4Soft tissue healing complete. Normal diet resumes (avoiding the provisional). First scheduled video review with the prosthodontist.
Month 3Osseointegration assessment. CBCT or periapical radiograph confirms bone-implant contact. Permanent crown impression taken if integration is complete.
Month 4Final crown cemented or screw-retained. Bite calibration. Maintenance schedule and home-care protocol established.
Year 1Annual review begins. Peri-implant probing depths logged. Radiographic crestal bone level documented as baseline for the long-term audit.
08

Compared to alternatives.

Honest takeaways
vs Conventional staged implants (3–6 month healing before crown)

Staged protocols remain the gold standard for compromised bone, posterior molars, or patients without primary stability >35 Ncm. Same-day is not 'better' — it is appropriate for the subset of cases where insertion torque, bone density, and occlusion allow immediate loading without bone strain.PMID 26701919

vs All-on-4 / All-on-6 full-arch rehabilitation

Same-day implants treat single teeth or small spans. All-on-4 / All-on-6 treats edentulous or terminal-dentition arches with 4 or 6 implants supporting a full-arch prosthesis. Different scope; we offer both.

vs Conventional bridges (no implant)

Bridges grind down adjacent healthy teeth for abutments and have a typical 10-year survival in the 70–80% range. Implants preserve adjacent teeth and have 10-year survival above 95%. Bridges remain the right answer when adjacent teeth need crowns anyway or implants are contraindicated.

vs Removable partial denture

Lower upfront cost, no surgery. The honest trade-off: bone resorption continues unopposed without an implant, accelerating future complexity. We do not steer patients away from dentures — we tell them what bone loss looks like at year 5 and let them choose.

09 · The package, and the price.One number on the page
Hektor · Same-day implants€650–950
UK private clinic£2,500–3,800
US private clinic$4,000–6,500
EU private clinic€2,200–3,500
What the Istanbul package includes
  • ·Single implant fixture (Straumann BLX or Nobel Active) + abutment + crown
  • ·CBCT 3D imaging + surgical planning
  • ·Provisional crown placed same-day (when primary stability allows)
  • ·Permanent crown at month 3–4 (zirconia or e.max ceramic)
  • ·Post-op medication kit (antibiotics, chlorhexidine rinse, analgesia)
  • ·Suture removal (if needed) + scheduled video reviews at week 2, month 3, month 4
  • ·Translator (8 languages) + airport transfers + optional hotel night
  • ·10-year implant warranty (subject to maintenance compliance)
How we calibrate the figures

Prices are per single-tooth implant; multi-unit cases are quoted per fixture with a multi-implant package discount. UK/US/EU figures are 2024–2025 publicly published private-clinic benchmarks for equivalent premium implant systems (Straumann, Nobel Biocare), not Hektor quotes.

Our Istanbul figure includes the permanent crown — many advertised low prices include only the fixture and the abutment, with the crown invoiced separately. We disclose this comparison transparently.

10

Common questions.

10 answered
Can the implant really be loaded on the same day?+
Yes, when primary stability is sufficient — insertion torque above 35 Ncm — and the planned crown position avoids excessive occlusal load. The literature (Esposito 2013 Cochrane review, Schrott 2014) shows immediate loading achieves equivalent long-term survival when these criteria are met. When they are not, we switch to a submerged protocol on the day and tell you at the chair.
How long does the implant last?+
Published meta-analyses report 92–97% at 10 years across multiple systems. Survival beyond 15 years has fewer cohorts — French 2015 reported 96% at 10 years; we extrapolate carefully past that.
What is peri-implantitis and will I get it?+
Peri-implantitis is bone loss around a previously stable implant, driven primarily by plaque biofilm and periodontal pathogens. The honest data: incidence is roughly 10–20% of patients at 10 years, but with rigorous home care and 6-monthly hygiene visits the per-implant rate drops well below 5%. Smoking and untreated periodontitis history are the dominant risk factors.
Can I get an implant if I have lost a lot of bone?+
Often yes, after a staged bone grafting procedure. Guided bone regeneration adds 4–6 months to the timeline but the eventual implant survival approaches that of native-bone cases. We do not place implants into insufficient bone; we tell you so at consultation and quote the staged plan honestly.
What if my implant fails?+
Early failures (within 3 months) usually mean the fixture did not osseointegrate. We remove it, let the site heal 2–3 months, and re-place — this is included in the 10-year warranty when maintenance compliance is documented. Late failures (peri-implantitis-driven) require a different protocol focused on the underlying biofilm cause.
Are Turkish-placed implants the same quality as UK / US implants?+
The implant fixtures are identical — Straumann BLX is the same product whether placed in Istanbul, London, or New York. The variable is the surgeon's training, case volume, and audit discipline. We disclose our volume and survival audit so you can compare them against your local options.
Will I be able to chew normally with a same-day provisional?+
Soft foods only for the first 2–4 weeks. The provisional is designed to look normal, not to handle full chewing force — putting heavy load on a freshly placed implant disrupts osseointegration. Once the permanent crown is fitted at month 3–4, normal chewing resumes.
Does the procedure hurt?+
Local anaesthesia eliminates pain during placement. Post-operative discomfort is typically less than a routine extraction — most patients describe it as 'pressure soreness' for 2–3 days, managed with paracetamol or ibuprofen.
Why are implants cheaper in Istanbul than the UK or US?+
Lower clinic overheads, lower salaries, favourable exchange rates, and a high concentration of implant-focused practices. Istanbul places more implants per year than any other European city — that volume creates expertise and operational efficiency. The fixtures are the same; the cost base is different.
How long do I need to stay in Istanbul?+
For the implant placement: two to three days is enough. You return at month 3–4 for the permanent crown — also a 2–3 day visit. Some patients arrange the crown remotely with a partner dentist in their home country; we provide all records and CAD/CAM files.
11 · Cited papers.11 linked · last updated 2026
01
Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysisFrench D, Larjava H, et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2015 · n=4,591 implants / 2,060 patients · PMID 25134415The largest single-system private-practice cohort: 99.0% cumulative implant survival at 5 years across all loading protocols and indications.
PubMed
02
The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trialsEsposito M, Grusovin MG, et al. · European Journal of Oral Implantology / Cochrane Database · 2013 · PMID 23543525Cochrane synthesis of randomised trials — no statistically significant survival difference between immediate, early, and conventional loading when primary stability is achieved.
PubMed
03
Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitisDerks J, Schaller D, et al. · Journal of Dental Research · 2016 · n=588 patients · PMID 267019199-year Swedish cohort: 14.5% prevalence of moderate-to-severe peri-implantitis — the honest long-term complication number, not the marketing figure.
PubMed
04
Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and ConditionsBerglundh T, Armitage G, et al. · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · 2018 · PMID 29926955The case-definition document that lets every implant programme measure peri-implantitis using the same threshold — bleeding-on-probing plus >2 mm bone loss.
PubMed
05
Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone Using a Novel Tapered Implant Design and a Digital Integrated Workflow: A Case SeriesIrinakis T, Ghannad F, et al. · International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry · 2023 · n=14 patients · PMID 37338919Early prospective series on the Straumann BLX design used at Hektor — 100% survival at 1-year recall in the anterior aesthetic zone.
PubMed
06
A Systematic Review of Survival Rates of Osseointegrated Implants in Fully and Partially Edentulous Patients Following Immediate LoadingHassanein A, Sleem H, et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2019Survival rates of 95–100% for immediate-loaded implants in the cited cohorts — consistent with the broader Cochrane finding.
DOI
07
Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxillaBornstein MM, Schmid B, et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2008 · PMID 18983314Multi-centre prospective trial establishing the SLActive surface's immediate-load survival profile in the posterior arch — the foundational dataset for current chairside protocols.
PubMed
08
Clinical outcomes of 3–5 years follow-up of immediate implant placement in posterior teeth: a prospective studyCheng Q, Su YY, et al. · BMC Oral Health · 2024Immediate posterior placement at 3–5 years: marginal bone loss and survival comparable to delayed protocols when torque thresholds are met.
DOI
09
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Immediate Loading and Delayed Loading of Single-Tooth Implants: 5-Year ResultsCesaretti G, Botticelli D, et al. · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants · 2018Single-tooth RCT at 5 years: 100% survival immediate-load vs 95.8% delayed-load — small absolute difference, neither clinically meaningful in this cohort.
DOI
10
Immediate Loading of Post-Extraction Implants: Success and Survival Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisLozano-Carrascal N, et al. · Applied Sciences · 2024Recent meta-analysis pooling 296 post-extraction immediate-load implants — survival consistent with the 2013 Cochrane finding, no new caveats.
DOI
11
Implant Placement and Loading Protocols — Consensus StatementsITI International Team for Implantology · ITI Academy Consensus Database · 2018The ITI 2018 consensus — defines immediate, early, and conventional loading windows and the patient-selection criteria for each.
Link
Talk to the team

Book this procedure.

A specialist-signed plan in 24 hours, with the bibliography for your specific candidacy attached. The deposit holds the day; the package is one number.

Book a day
Related
No-prep veneers — the evidenceAll-on-4 / All-on-6 — the evidenceMicroscope endodontics — the evidenceThe Dental pillarAll 16 proceduresThe specialists
Language · 语言 · اللغة · زبان · Язык · Sprache · Langue
EnglishالعربيةفارسیDeutschFrançais
JCI Accredited✦TEMOS Certified✦JCI Accredited✦TEMOS Certified✦JCI Accredited✦TEMOS Certified✦JCI Accredited✦TEMOS Certified✦
Book a day